Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) is often regarded as a more accurate measure for assessing perfusion compared to Blood Pressure (BP) due to its direct correlation with perfusion pressure across various organ systems. MAP is defined as the average arterial pressure during a single cardiac cycle, calculated using the formula MAP = DBP + 1/3(SBP - DBP) (Pillunat et al., 2015). This calculation reflects the pressure that drives blood through the circulatory system, providing a more stable indicator of perfusion than systolic or diastolic blood pressure alone.
This issue is even more important, as healthcare personnel typically utilize the NIBP feature on the monitor/defibrillator during critical events. In reality, the accuracy of NIBP Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) is comparable to invasive arterial lines (Lehman, 2013). This is a result of the fact that the NIBP function measures MAP directly and estimate the systolic and diastolic pressure from the MAP. Thus, it is more effective to titrate your treatment efforts to a MAP; an even more detailed picture is obtained, when coupled with ECG, SpO2, and EtCO2.
One of the primary reasons MAP is favored over BP in perfusion assessment is its relationship with cerebral perfusion. Studies have demonstrated that cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) are directly related to systemic MAP, particularly within a certain range where this relationship appears linear (Qiao et al., 2022). A decrease in MAP can lead to significant reductions in cerebral perfusion, particularly in areas already predisposed to hypoperfusion, which can result in ischemia or infarction (Qiao et al., 2022). This underscores the importance of maintaining adequate MAP levels to ensure sufficient perfusion to vital organs, including the brain (Ono et al., 2014).
Moreover, MAP provides a more comprehensive assessment of perfusion in conditions where blood flow may be compromised. For instance, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, maintaining MAP within an autoregulatory range is crucial for ensuring adequate perfusion to organs such as the kidneys, which also rely on autoregulation (Ono et al., 2014). Conversely, relying solely on BP measurements may not accurately reflect the perfusion status, as evidenced by findings that indicated limited predictive value of MAP in assessing liver perfusion during sepsis (Marchesi et al., 2019). This suggests that MAP may not only be more reliable but also necessary for evaluating perfusion in complex clinical scenarios.
In the context of myocardial perfusion, advanced imaging techniques such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) have shown that automated perfusion mapping can yield quantitative estimates of myocardial blood flow (MBF) that are comparable to those obtained from positron emission tomography (PET) (Brown et al., 2018; , Kellman et al., 2016). These techniques allow for a more objective assessment of perfusion, which is critical in diagnosing conditions like coronary artery disease (CAD) (Engblom et al., 2016). The ability of CMR to provide detailed perfusion maps enhances diagnostic accuracy, particularly in distinguishing between normal and ischemic myocardium (Lockie et al., 2011).
In summary, MAP serves as a more accurate and reliable measure of perfusion compared to BP due to its direct correlation with blood flow dynamics in various organs, its ability to reflect changes in perfusion status more sensitively, and its integration with advanced imaging modalities that enhance diagnostic precision. This makes MAP an essential parameter in both clinical and research settings for assessing perfusion.
References:
- Brown, L., Onciul, S., Broadbent, D., Johnson, K., Fent, G., Foley, J., … & Plein, S. (2018). Fully automated, inline quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: repeatability of measurements in healthy subjects. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 20(1), 48.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0462-y
- Engblom, H., Xue, H., Akil, S., Carlsson, M., Hindorf, C., Oddstig, J., … & Arheden, H. (2016). Fully quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion ready for clinical use: a comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 19(1), 78.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0388-9
- Kellman, P., Hansen, M., Nielles‐Vallespin, S., Nickander, J., Themudo, R., Ugander, M., … & Xue, H. (2016). Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimized dual sequence and reconstruction for quantification. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 19(1), 43.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0355-5
- Lehman LW, Saeed M, Talmor D, Mark R, Malhotra A. Methods of blood pressure measurement in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):34-40.
- Lockie, T., Ishida, M., Perera, D., Chiribiri, A., Silva, K., Kozerke, S., … & Plein, S. (2011). High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57(1), 70-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.019
- Marchesi, S., Nieto, F., Ahlgren, K., Roneus, A., Feinstein, R., Lipcsey, M., … & Hedenstierna, G. (2019). Abdominal organ perfusion and inflammation in experimental sepsis: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Ajp Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 316(1), G187-G196.
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00151.2018
- Ono, M., Brady, K., Easley, R., Brown, C., Kraut, M., Gottesman, R., … & Hogue, C. (2014). Duration and magnitude of blood pressure below cerebral autoregulation threshold during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with major morbidity and operative mortality. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 147(1), 483-489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.069
- Pillunat, K., Spoerl, E., Jasper, C., Furashova, O., Hermann, C., Borrmann, A., … & Pillunat, L. (2015). Nocturnal blood pressure in primary open‐angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica, 93(8).
https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12740
- Qiao, X., Duan, J., Zhang, N., Yang, D., Wang, X., Pei, Y., … & Li, J. (2022). Risk factors of impaired perfusion in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery steno-occlusive disease. Frontiers in Neurology, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.801413