Field amputation, the surgical removal of a limb at the scene of an accident or in a remote location, is a critical and life-saving intervention in certain traumatic situations. The decision to perform a field amputation is guided by specific indications that signal the necessity for immediate limb removal to prevent further harm and save the patient's life. Several key factors play a role in determining when field amputation is warranted in cases of severe trauma.
One of the primary indications for field amputation is uncontrollable haemodynamic instability, where the patient's condition is rapidly deteriorating due to massive blood loss or other factors affecting their circulatory system (Nayar et al., 2021). In such critical situations, prompt action is essential to prevent the patient from going into shock or succumbing to their injuries. Additionally, extensive and concurrent soft tissue, bone, vascular, and nerve injuries can also necessitate field amputation (Nayar et al., 2021). When the trauma affects multiple structures within the limb, making it impossible to salvage or repair, amputation may be the only viable option to prevent further complications.
Prolonged limb ischemia, another significant indication for field amputation, occurs when the blood supply to a limb is severely compromised for an extended period, leading to tissue death and irreversible damage (Nayar et al., 2021). In cases where attempts to restore blood flow have failed, or the limb is deemed unsalvageable due to ischemic injury, amputation becomes a crucial intervention to prevent systemic complications such as sepsis. Moreover, blunt arterial trauma or crush injuries, which can severely compromise the blood flow to a limb, may also necessitate immediate amputation in the field to mitigate the risk of complications and improve the patient's overall prognosis (Nayar et al., 2021).
The decision to perform a field amputation is often made in high-stress environments by a variety of medical professionals, including trauma surgeons, emergency physicians, and paramedics (Yu et al., 2022). These individuals must assess the severity of the trauma, the patient's condition, and the feasibility of limb salvage in a time-critical manner to determine the most appropriate course of action. While limb salvage is generally preferred when feasible, certain trauma scenarios leave no choice but to opt for amputation to ensure the patient's survival and prevent further harm.
In cases of trauma-related amputations, the risk of infection and other complications is a significant concern (Ali et al., 2019). Amputations associated with trauma carry a high morbidity risk due to tissue damage, contamination, and the potential for infection. Delayed closure of amputation sites has been shown to be associated with decreased infection rates, highlighting the importance of proper wound management and post-operative care in reducing complications and improving outcomes for trauma patients undergoing amputation procedures (Ali et al., 2019).
Trauma, particularly in the context of upper extremity injuries, is a common indication for amputation, with studies indicating that trauma accounts for a significant proportion of all amputations, especially in the upper extremities (Erşen et al., 2020). The severity and extent of trauma, coupled with the specific injuries sustained, can sometimes necessitate primary amputation at the time of initial assessment and stabilization to address life-threatening conditions and prevent further complications (Chandra et al., 2021). In cases where the trauma is so severe that limb salvage is not feasible or poses a significant risk to the patient's life, immediate amputation may be the only viable option.
In the context of lower extremity trauma, the decision to amputate is influenced by various factors, including the presence of soft tissue injuries, open fractures, nerve damage, and the mechanism of trauma (Croman, 2023). Blunt trauma, in particular, has been identified as a risk factor for amputation in cases of lower extremity arterial injuries, underscoring the importance of considering the nature of the trauma when determining the need for limb removal (Cho et al., 2020). Factors such as the extent of injury, patient comorbidities, and the duration of ischemia also play a crucial role in the success of replantation procedures and overall patient outcomes (Cakmak et al., 2022).
In conclusion, field amputation is a critical intervention in cases of severe trauma where limb salvage is not feasible or poses a significant risk to the patient's life. Indications for field amputation include uncontrollable hemodynamic instability, extensive soft tissue and vascular injuries, prolonged limb ischemia, and blunt arterial trauma or crush injuries. The decision to perform a field amputation is guided by the need to prevent further harm, control bleeding, and improve the patient's overall prognosis. Proper wound management, infection control, and post-operative care are essential in reducing complications and optimizing outcomes for trauma patients undergoing amputation procedures. Ultimately, the decision to perform a field amputation requires a careful assessment of the patient's condition, the nature of the trauma, and the feasibility of limb salvage to ensure the best possible outcome for the individual; but must be decided in a fairly rapid manner with swift implementation.
References:
- Ali, Y., Halvorson, J., Nunn, A., & Miller, P. (2019). Delayed closure is associated with decreased infection rate in amputations after trauma. The American Surgeon, 85(5), 501-504.
https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481908500527
- Cakmak, F., Dogruyol, S., & Çakmak, M. (2022). Üst ekstremite yaralanmalarına bağlı gelişen dijital amputasyonlar: acil servise başvuran hastaların geriye dönük analizi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(4), 1528-1533.
https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1181163
- Chandra, A., Harvey, L., Fardi, S., Krohn, E., Anwer, S., & Harmon, J. (2021). A vascularized emergency trauma amputation simulator for surgical skills training. Journal of Surgical Simulation, 37-43.
https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0005
- Cho, H., Lee, C., Song, S., Kim, S., & Chung, S. (2020). Traumatic peripheral arterial injury with open repair: a 10-year single-institutional analysis. The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 53(5), 291-296.
https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.19.087
- Croman, M. (2023). Outcomes following below knee arterial trauma. The American Surgeon, 89(10), 4045-4049.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348231175502
- Erşen, Ö., Kilinç, N., Neyisci, C., & Bek, D. (2020). Türkiye’de ampütasyonların endikasyonları, komplikasyonları ve revizyonları. Ege Tıp Dergisi, 59(4), 251-257.
https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.833737
- Nayar, S., Alcock, H., & Edwards, D. (2021). Primary amputation versus limb salvage in upper limb major trauma: a systematic review. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 32(3), 395-403.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03008-x
- Yu, B., Lee, G., Lee, M., Choi, K., Gwak, J., Park, Y., … & Lee, J. (2022). A case report of field amputation: the rescue of an entrapped patient through the "doctor car" system. Journal of Trauma and Injury, 35(Suppl 1), S27-S30.
https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2022.0012